President
Obama's Plans To Change International Business
Taxation
In
May, 2009, the Obama administration unveiled its
much-anticipated proposals for international tax
reform.
According
to an announcement by the Treasury Department
issued on May 4 under the title ‘Leveling
the Playing Field,’ the reforms seek to
achieve two broad objectives: removing tax incentives
for US companies to invest overseas; and curbing
the use of offshore jurisdictions by both companies
and wealthy individuals. The proposals, however,
affect many areas of corporate tax policy and
would modify the law surrounding companies’
ability to defer tax on foreign earnings, foreign
tax credits and the classification of foreign
businesses.
“Today,
President Obama and Secretary Geithner are unveiling
two components of the Administration's plan to
reform our international tax laws and improve
their enforcement,” said the Treasury. “First,
they are calling for reforms to ensure that our
tax code does not stack the deck against job creation
here on our shores. Second, they seek to reduce
the amount of taxes lost to tax havens –
either through unintended loopholes that allow
companies to legally avoid paying billions in
taxes, or through the illegal use of hidden accounts
by well-off individuals.”
When
combined with additional international tax reforms
that are due to be unveiled in the Obama administration's
full budget later in May, these initiatives would
raise USD210bn over the next 10 years.
One
of the most significant aspects of the proposed
reforms for companies is the sweeping changes
to ‘deferral’ – the part of
the tax code which Obama blames for allowing companies
to “ship jobs overseas.”
According
to the Treasury, under current rules, businesses
that invest overseas can take immediate deductions
on their US tax returns for expenses supporting
their overseas investments but nevertheless "defer"
paying US taxes on the profits they make from
those investments. This, the government argues,
means that “a significant tax advantage”
is given to companies who invest overseas relative
to those who invest at home. Under the proposed
reforms, the deferral rules would be changed so
that – with the exception of research and
experimentation expenses – companies cannot
receive deductions on their US tax returns supporting
their offshore investments until they pay taxes
on their offshore profits. This provision would
take effect in 2011, and the Treasury expects
that an additional USD60.1bn in tax revenues would
be raised from 2011 to 2019 as a result.
In
addition, the proposals would change the tax code
to prevent US companies from artificially inflating
or accelerating foreign tax credits, which companies
claim against their US taxes for taxes paid on
foreign profits. This would raise an additional
USD43bn from 2011 to 2019.
The
tax revenues raised by these two provisions would
be used to make permanent the Research and Experimentation
Tax Credit, which has been extended temporarily
many times and is next due to expire at the end
of 2009.
The
second element of the international tax reforms,
entitled “Getting Tough on Overseas Tax
Havens” (as opposed to “domestic”
tax havens) seeks to raise USD95.2bn over the
next 10 years by changing rules surrounding ‘passive’
income, increasing disclosure requirements for
individuals with offshore banks accounts, strengthening
the Qualified Intermediary program, and beefing
up penalties for failure to disclose information.
They include:
- Eliminating
Loopholes for "Disappearing" Offshore
Subsidiaries: The Obama administration proposes
to reform 'check the box' rules to require certain
foreign subsidiaries to be considered as separate
corporations for US tax purposes. This is designed
to prevent companies from making their foreign
subsidiaries "disappear" when shifting
passive income. This provision would take effect
in 2011, raising USD86.5bn from 2011 to 2019.
- Cracking
Down on Offshore Tax Evasion by Individuals:
In addition to initiatives taken within the
G-20 to impose sanctions on countries judged
by their peers not to be adequately implementing
information exchange standards, the Obama Administration
proposes a comprehensive package of disclosure
and enforcement measures to make it more difficult
for financial institutions and wealthy individuals
to evade taxes. The Administration "conservatively"
estimates this package would raise USD8.7bn
over 10 years by:
-
Withholding Taxes From Offshore Accounts: This
proposal requires foreign financial institutions
that have dealings with the United States to
sign an agreement with the IRS to become a "Qualified
Intermediary" and share as much information
about their US customers as US financial institutions
do, or else face the presumption that they may
be facilitating tax evasion and have taxes withheld
on payments to their customers.
-
Shifting the Burden of Proof and Increasing
Penalties: In addition, the Obama Administration
proposes tightening the reporting standards
for overseas investments, increasing penalties
and imposing negative presumptions on individuals
who fail to report foreign accounts, and extending
the statute of limitations for enforcement.
-
New Resources for IRS Enforcement: As part of
the Obama Administration's budget, the IRS will
hire nearly 800 new employees devoted to international
enforcement, increasing its ability to crack
down on offshore tax avoidance.
The reforms build on proposals by Senate Finance
Committee Chairman Max Baucus and House Ways and
Means Chairman Charles Rangel – as well
as other Democratic leaders like Senator Carl
Levin and Congressman Lloyd Doggett.
Rangel,
who drafted similar legislative proposals in 2007,
said: “Today’s announcement by President
Obama and Secretary Geithner is another strong
step toward fulfilling the Administration’s
promise to strengthen opportunities for investment
and job creation here in the US For too long,
our tax laws have rewarded companies that invest
and keep their money overseas and turned a blind
eye to the use of tax havens by the wealthy."
He
added: “Our tax code should reward companies
that thrive by continuing to invest in America
and American workers. I applaud President Obama’s
commitment to simplifying our tax code and look
forward to working with the Administration to
close these loopholes.”
However,
Baucus issued a more cautious response to the
proposals, and said that more study is required
to see how American companies will be influenced
by the suggested policies.
“The
President’s proposals highlight an important
point — our corporate international tax
system needs reforming,” he commented. “There
are a number of Finance Committee ideas reflected
here, such as the proposal to address offshore
tax evasion and making the R&D credit permanent
for businesses, but further study is needed to
assess the impact of this plan on US businesses.”
“I
want to make certain that our tax policies are
fair and support the global competitiveness of
US businesses,” Baucus added. “These
policies must be designed to encourage economic
growth and create good-paying jobs Americans need
right now. The proposals announced by the President
today set the table for tax reform, and I look
forward to sitting down with the Administration
soon to take up these issues.”
Business,
however, is understandably hostile to the proposals,
with the National Foreign Trade Council (NFTC)
describing them as “counterproductive”
during a time of economic stagnation.
“The
international tax provisions announced today would
saddle US-based multinational companies with what
amounts to a tax increase at a time when they
are doing all they can to remain competitive and
protect and grow US jobs,” observed NFTC
Vice President for Tax Policy Cathy Schultz
“We
are disappointed that today’s announcement
did not mention reforming the corporate tax rate,
which is the second highest in the world,”
said Schultz, adding: “The tax provisions
proposed today would just pile on an additional
tax, jeopardizing US-based multinational companies’
ability to compete both here and overseas.”
US
Chamber of Commerce Chief Economist Dr. Marty
Regalia argued that deferral has been “mischaracterized”
as a tax break when it actually provides a “vital
mechanism” for US companies to claim relief
from double taxation.
“The
United States is the only major industrialized
country which double taxes the overseas earnings
of our companies. Since other countries don’t
subject their companies to double taxation, US
companies need deferral to stay competitive in
the global marketplace,” he said.
“A
huge tax hike on US employers is not the way to
stimulate our economy. Congress should reject
this approach,” Regalia warned.
By
September, 2009, not much progress had been made
in the Congress to implement the President's plans.
|